Mobile apps that hold up where the signal drops

A mobile app development company designs the flows, builds the iOS and Android apps and their backend, ships them through App Store and Google Play review, and keeps them working after each OS update. Hashlogics does all of that with senior engineers, for enterprises and startups.

Yes. We usually ship both from one React Native codebase, as we did with BrandLocator. Where a feature needs the device at full depth, we write that part natively in Swift or Kotlin.

Yes. Enterprise mobile apps get single sign-on, device-management distribution, offline sync and role permissions. Shift Link and TankAware are both React Native apps used by workers in the field, with compliance checks and five permission tiers respectively.

Yes. The code, the backend accounts and the App Store and Google Play developer accounts are yours in writing before work starts. You can take the app in-house or to another firm at any point.

React Native fits most business apps, because one codebase serves both stores and the work does not double. TankAware, Shift Link and ExtraaJe all run on it. Go native in Swift or Kotlin when the app leans hard on the camera or background location. The same applies to any platform feature React Native reaches badly. We give you the answer in the scoping call, before you have spent anything.

Yes, when we design for it from the start, which is the only time it is affordable. That means picking which records live on the phone and showing the user what is queued. It also means agreeing a rule for two people editing the same record offline. Bolting offline support onto a finished app usually means rebuilding the data layer.

You do: we publish under your own developer accounts, so the listings and the signing keys stay yours. Both stores review submissions and both reject builds for reasons that change over time. Handling that is part of the engagement rather than a surprise your team meets on launch day.

Your app gets tested against it and updated, under an agreed service level or by your own team after a documented handover. You pick which at the start. The first 2 months of support and maintenance are free, with every build. An unmaintained app does not fail on release day. It fails quietly, one OS version later, and your users just stop opening it.

Yes: we build new systems and rescue ones another team built, and a mobile app is no exception. We read the codebase, run the app in the conditions it is actually used in, and report what is fixable against what should be replaced. That work is the fixed-fee Blueprint, credited in full against the build, and if the plan isn't one you'd act on, you don't pay for it.

It can use what you already run, through your existing APIs, which is usually cheaper than any migration. Shift Link's app calls the same Supabase backend the web platform uses, plus the UK government's Right to Work API. We only propose a new backend when the old one cannot serve a phone safely.

Cost is driven by the number of platforms, how much of the app must work offline, and how many systems it has to talk to. Quoting a range before seeing the workflow is guessing, and the guess is always wrong in the same direction. The scoping call is free, and the fixed-fee Blueprint, credited in full against the build, gives you one fixed price before the build starts.

Both, and the shape differs. A startup usually wants one workflow in users' hands and evidence it holds up, so we ship narrow and instrument it. An enterprise wants role-based access, audit trails and integration with systems already running, which is what TankAware needed across five permission tiers. The offline and release discipline is identical.